Site map

AI automation with human approval

AI sorts, summarises and drafts. Anything binding waits for your approval. Models and data stay in the EU.

The principle: machine drafts, humans decide

Every AI step in our flows ends at a clear point. Either the result is safe enough for a rule, or it waits for your approval. Uncertain fields get a check note instead of a guessed answer.

  • AI prepares: text, classification, summaries, categories
  • Rules decide the clear cases: duplicates, thresholds, required fields
  • People approve anything that goes outside: send, booking, payment, commitment, activation, access removal
  • Uncertain fields are flagged: unchecked status plus a concrete note on what to check

Models in the EU, data in the EU

We prefer EU systems, including capable open-source models. Other models only if they are hosted in the EU. Operations and backups run on European infrastructure. That does not replace a processing agreement; one is signed per project.

  • EU systems and open-source models first
  • Other models only with hosting in the EU
  • Credentials live in the instance, not in chats
  • Access by person, revocation after the project
  • No hidden training on your customer data

Four patterns from running flows

Abstracted from real work, no client names. Each pattern follows the same order: capture, check, then commit.

  1. 1. Capture

    Audio enters the flow, split into chunks automatically.

  2. 2. Transcribe

    Speech recognition writes the conversation with speaker separation.

  3. 3. Summarise

    AI drafts an internal and a neutral external version.

  4. 4. Approve

    A person checks and approves before anything is sent.

  5. 5. File

    Record and document land in the system with an audit trail.

Pattern A: speech to record. Audio is transcribed, summarised and filed as a document. Approval decides which version goes out.
  1. 1. Note arrives

    Message or file from day-to-day work.

  2. 2. AI reads along

    The model pulls out people, companies and requests.

  3. 3. Check existing records

    Matched against contacts and companies on file.

  4. 4. Create or enrich

    New only what is missing. Otherwise enriched.

  5. 5. CRM is current

    Contact, company and history sit in one place.

Pattern B: day-to-day work to CRM. Notes from chat and files become contacts. What exists is not created twice.
  1. 1. Document arrives

    Invoice from inbox or chat; duplicates leave via checksum.

  2. 2. Read

    Text recognition reads amounts, dates and numbers.

  3. 3. Classify

    AI proposes category and tax; uncertain items are flagged.

  4. 4. Review and approve

    Draft in accounting, a person approves.

  5. 5. Book

    Only after approval does the document become binding.

Pattern C: document to booking. Documents are recognised, checked and prepared as drafts. Booking happens only after review.
  1. 1. Occasion is set

    Onboarding or a ticket supplies the context.

  2. 2. Draft

    AI writes the text from the case, with the open points.

  3. 3. Approval

    A person checks tone and content.

  4. 4. Send

    Only then does the message go out.

Pattern D: Draft with approval. Welcome or reply. The text becomes binding only after a person agrees.

Where AI deliberately does not decide

Some steps stay manual with system support. Binding quotes, payments, cancellations and anything hard to undo need a person. AI delivers the draft; responsibility stays with you.

  • No automatic send to customers without approval
  • No booking or payment without review
  • No commitments on dates or prices without a person
  • No access removal without approval
  • Every case stays traceable with time and status

Frequently asked questions

Which AI models do you use?

EU systems first, including capable open-source models. Other models only if they are hosted in the EU. Which model runs in your flow is written into the order.

Do you train models on our data?

No. There is no hidden training on your customer data. Processing only on instruction, with a processing agreement and deletion after the project.

What happens when the AI is unsure?

Then it does not guess. The field gets an unchecked status and a concrete check note, for example check invoice number or check due date.

Can the AI send without approval here?

Only where the risk allows it and you agreed in writing, for example purely internal notes. Anything that goes outside or moves money stays tied to approval.

Where do I see what the AI did?

Every case gets a log entry with time and status. Drafts, approvals and sends stay verifiable.

If a process is eating time in your team, describe it. We will say honestly whether automation is worth it.